Now Playing on JYB Films

Anatomy of the Comic Jihad


Movie File Host
YouTube YouTube
Putfile Putfile


Movie File Host
YouTube

The Meaning of Taqiyya







button02b
fpawbn
July 2007
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31        
$1 Shipping for 4 days, only at Overstock.com!
button
Recent Comments
•By gretchen
 at Jan 20, 2:06 PM about
 WARMING UP
•By Nathaniel Freedman
 at Jan 20, 12:26 PM about
 WARMING UP
•By Andrea Harris
 at Jan 20, 12:24 PM about
 WARMING UP
•By The Barrister
 at Jan 20, 11:32 AM about
 WARMING UP
•By michael parker
 at Jan 20, 11:29 AM about
 WARMING UP
•By Bryan
 at Jan 20, 10:27 AM about
 WARMING UP
•By ockham
 at Jan 20, 10:07 AM about
 WARMING UP
Archives

Content Staff
Technical Staff
credit where due
This site is still alive and kicking thanks to the generosity and talents of Alan M. Carroll (aka Annoying Old Guy). Without him, the JYB would still be suffering with Blogger's bad code and long-term archive loss.
Powered by
Hosted By
Anti-Junk: 7719 sources banned.

WARMING UP

Today's one of those days where I have to do a lot of writing--on the job, I mean. I'm working on a script for a 10-12 minute program, and need to get it hammered into some kind of shape by day's end. I already have the skeletal framework in place, but need to put some meat into it. So now I'm warming up, getting the brain used to making phrases and stringing them together.

I like the Super Bowl matchup. Since John Gruden left Oakland last year, I'd hoped the Raiders would get the chance for a little revenge. Now they have it. They won't be playing for that of course--as the oldest team in the league, the urgency of the situation isn't lost on them. But Gruden's Chuckie scowl will be prowling the sidelines opposite the Raiders, and they'll be aware of it.

Watched The Two Towers on Saturday. Wow. It's an amazing, astounding epic that after its three hours left me wanting more. If you haven't seen it yet, you owe it to yourself to do it. No finer film has been made since, well, the first installment of Peter Jackson's Lord of the Rings trilogy treatment. It's tough to put into words just how good this film is--like the first one, every shot is masterfully framed, ever scene masterfully rendered, and the tale marvelously told. It's grander than anything else out there, and deeper too. Seeing it made me ask myself over and over, like a man going slightly mad, "Why can't Lucas do this? Why can't Lucas do this?" Jackson's LOTR series is what the Star Wars tales should've been--epic without cheesiness, and including things like believable dialogue, nuanced acting and a real feeling that the good guys are fighting actual evil. I think George Lucas simply took a different path, turned his great yarn into a kids' bedtime story, and thereby robbed it of the depth it should have. He made that choice while making Return of the Jedi, and has stayed the course ever since. He probably thought that that was where the money is, and to an extent it's true that kids see more movies and buy more movie-related junk, but the price has been the credibility of the series and its author. Peter Jackson could've taken that route too, but he didn't, and has made a landmark series of films. Lucas stopped making landmarks in 1979. Empire will probably go down as the last truly good Star Wars film.

I've been worried quite a bit lately. Sure, about the war, and about North Korea (on which even a Bush supporter like myself must acknowledge that the administration has of late bungled the whole thing), and about our resolve to defend our civilization. One of the strangest critiques I've heard of The Two Towers is this bit about its racism--that because all the major good characters are white in one form or another, it's an inherently racist film. Leave aside for the moment that most of the characters aren't even human--the real heroes turn out to be Hobbits, elves and walking trees, for goodness' sake--what should Peter Jackson have done? Several years ago, Kevin Costner starred as an English accent-mangling Robin Hood, and his opposite was Morgan Freeman. The original Robin Hood tales didn't have any identifiably black characters, so the director or writer or whoever (probably some suit at the studio) decided to create one, and thus the Muslim Abu became Robin of Locksley's best mate. If you'll recall, that film was lambasted for lots of good reasons, but mostly because the Morgan Freeman character, though played well, seemed so out of place. He was obviously there as part of some quota. Should Peter Jackson have followed that route, maybe made Gandalf Hispanic, or the Hobbits all Japanese? Other critiques mention that because all the major characters are played by beautiful white people, then somehow the rest of us can't identify with them. That critique truly worries me. If you can't see the humanity, the basic level humanness, of the characters--even the walking trees--because they have Nordic features and long blond hair or are otherwise different in appearance from you, I pity you. You have trouble seeing humanity beyond your own nose. That being the case, we'll have a hard time seeing the humanity in each other that we'll need to rise to our common defense. For all our supposed progress, we are in many ways still a tribal species.

Another thing that worries me is the state of parenting these days. Everybody Loves Raymond captured it well in last night's episode. Ray and Deborah had made some new friends, the Williamsons, who were nice but were raising a monster of a son. He was terrible, always invading the parents' conversation, smarting off to Ray, leading the other kids into mischief, and his parents never called him down. Ray sees it immediately, Deborah thinks he's overreacting, but eventually sees the kid's evil ways and they break off the friendship. Unfortunately, life isn't a sitcom and breaking off the friendship over an obnoxious kid isn't usually even an option. Of all the parents I know well, I can probably count on one hand (okay, maybe one and a half) the number of kids I see being raised with any kind of respect for their parents or for basic societal norms. It seems that our generation of parents isn't bothering to teach our kids "Please" and "Thank you," and sirs and ma'ams must be as dead as Latin. It's kind of simple as a concept, but apparently beyond most parents, that kids aren't born with an institutional memory of how to behave. We parents have to teach them how to be decent. I sometimes worry that in teaching our son to be polite, to share his toys with his friends, and to mind what we say, that we're actually setting him up for other kids to take advantage of him later. These other kids will have been given "choices" and "suggestions" instead of instruction, and will have been firmly in control of their own parents for years by the time my boy meets them at school. They'll have already developed the skills of manipulation, having honed them on their parents and likely their parents' friends. Supposing my kid actually retains the manners we're trying to teach him, he may be easy pickings for these brats. I've actually lost sleep over this.

Well, I think I'm warmed up. Thanks for indulging me if you've read this far. Off to tame a script.

UPDATE: This may help explain why Raymond gets it right.
Post to del.icio.us

Posted by B. Preston on January 20, 2003 9:22 AM
Trackbacks: View (0)Ping
Comments

Hey, I always read this far!

On the matter of impolite youth, don’t worry too much. Bloggers (the old ink and paper version) have been bemoaning rude and immoral youth for 4500 years now. If society really declined at the rate each generation believes, China would have gone back to the Stone Age by 2000 BC. (The first such comment was in 2500 BC.)

What really happens is that each new generation picks a couple of taboos that especially excite their parents, and violates those taboos. But a few years later, each new generation picks a couple of areas where their parents are “unenlightened” (i.e. loose) and tightens up in those areas. So the total number of taboos is invariant across generations. (A classic example: the Greatest Generation thought tobacco was normal and homosexuality was abnormal. Their children, the Boomers, believe tobacco is abhorrent and homosexuality is normal.)

Posted by ockham on January 20, 2003 10:07 AM

I hope you’re right. It is odd that in New York is a far greater moral offense to smoke than to abort a child these days. I guess I’m old-fashioned—it just makes no sense to me.

Posted by Bryan on January 20, 2003 10:27 AM

The same crowd who looks for the racism in Star Wars movies and now LOTR has failed to give me the numbers of non-white fans who are interested in these stories.

Really, what is the black readership/viewership of these movies and do they really care?

I can just hear the exchange as Strider Aragorn approaches the King wih a black sidekick… “But he comes from a tropical climate, and this is a temperate climate…”

I share your concerns, Bryan. I’ve tried to inculcate these values into my children, and although they can be impolite and, occasionally, downright rude, they usually treat others with kindness and respect.

The best we can do is to give our children our values, and teach them to stand up for themselves in the face of all types of bullying, whether it be of the playground variety or on a deeper, psychological level (such as indoctrination of anti-Christian values by the media). Give them a strong moral center and they can work their way out of those other situations. But… it’s kept me up at nights, as well. :-P

I must say I’ve been lucky that all my friends who have children seem to believe in the value of teaching politeness and good behavior.

Re: “racism” in Tolkien. Today’s pc crowd would have us eschew common sense and reality (well, in so far as a fantasy must conform to reality) in favor of some truly nonsensical world where people with different colored skin all live in one country — without rhyme or reason. Speaking of Robin Hood, there was a British tv series back in the Eighties which also had a Saracen character, Nasir — played by a white guy, Mark Ryan. Here’s a fan page on the series (it was much better than that Kevin Costner atrocity, which I turned off and did not finish watching after the scene where Costner runs up to some men and stops dead and says, “The sheriff is coming,” in a flat Midwestern accent, and with the bored air of someone announcing the arrival of the mail.)

I think that the problems with Attack of the Clones run deeper than you suggest, Bryan. Attack of the Clones used far too much computer effects. The result is that you have huge scenes that seriously lack emotion and the whole is less epic than simply overwhelming and disorienting. You tend to not focus on the action that is going on and instead wait for something else to happen, even in non-cgi scenes. As a result the movie seems disjointed and lacks story. In LOTR the battle scenes may have had a bunch of CGI but there were also actual closeups on the characters that added to the story, even (gasp) dialogue. Another problem with AotC was that the dialogue was really stilted and was occasionally not believable, which really hurt the omniportant suspension of disbelief. If any thing, there should have been less action scenes and more conversation between the villians and the protagonists (and the script should have been revised).

Posted by Nathaniel Freedman on January 20, 2003 12:26 PM

“They’ll have already developed the skills of manipulation, having honed them on their parents and likely their parents’ friends.”

I don’t they will have learned manipulation. You don’t have to manipulate to someone who grants your every request. You only have to manipulate those who may be reluctant to give you what you want. A child of parents who can say no sometimes is more likely to learn the art of manipulation (or persuasion, to say it in a positive way). You would do your child no favors by teaching him the “skills” that these other kids have. Says the proud parent of three cats.

Posted by gretchen on January 20, 2003 2:06 PM
Post a comment