Now Playing on JYB Films

Anatomy of the Comic Jihad


Movie File Host
YouTube YouTube
Putfile Putfile


Movie File Host
YouTube

The Meaning of Taqiyya







button02b
fpawbn
July 2007
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31        
$1 Shipping for 4 days, only at Overstock.com!
button
Recent Comments
•By Bryan
 at May 13, 6:06 PM about
 AL QAEDA STRIKES
•By Diana
 at May 13, 4:35 PM about
 AL QAEDA STRIKES
•By Bryan
 at May 13, 3:31 PM about
 AL QAEDA STRIKES
•By Diana
 at May 13, 10:23 AM about
 AL QAEDA STRIKES
Archives

Content Staff
Technical Staff
credit where due
This site is still alive and kicking thanks to the generosity and talents of Alan M. Carroll (aka Annoying Old Guy). Without him, the JYB would still be suffering with Blogger's bad code and long-term archive loss.
Powered by
Hosted By
Anti-Junk: 7719 sources banned.

AL QAEDA STRIKES

More Islamic, or Arab--whatever--mass murder. This time a team of thugs rammed their way into a gated expat community in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, shooting at innocent civilians before detonating a series of bombs. Scores are dead, including many Americans. The death toll seems to rise every time I hit "Refresh." This looks like the largest terrorist attack since Bali, which killed over 200 tourists.

Of course, this all took place on Saudi soil, and in the wake of our win in Iraq and the announcement that we're pulling our troops out of Saudi Arabia. Wasn't that one of al Qaeda's stated reasons for hating us? It was a lie obviously. They didn't really care that we were in Saudi Arabia, just that we were. That we exist. It's a sad fact that many of us still don't get this.

On 9-11, 15 of the 19 hijackers were Saudi. Today's attack took place on Saudi soil, the third major al Qaeda attack against American or Western interests to take place on Saudi soil since 1995. In the first two, the Saudis played a double game, insisting that they were assisting our investigation while in reality blocking it at every turn. The Saudis executed some of the Khobar Towers bombers before we had the chance to interrogate them, permanently silencing them. If the Saudis so much as breathe that they're playing that game around this time around, it should mean the end of Saudi rule in Arabia. No more games, no more coverups. Total cooperation or the US forces that are leaving can stay put and invade from within.

As for al Qaeda, today's attack was pretty pathetic by its standards. That terrorist army once hijacked multiple aircraft simultaneously and flew them into American skyscrapers. It openly sought nuclear and biological weapons material. But the best it can do now after nearly two years of direct warfare against us is crash the gates of a civilian community and kill unarmed people. Al Qaeda's old MO was to always top its last attack. Judging by that, today's attack indicates that while it's still capable of mounting small-scale attacks in its own backyard, it is largely a spent force elsewhere. We need to keep up the pressure and destroy what's left, never relenting until the last terrorist is dead.
Post to del.icio.us

Posted by B. Preston on May 13, 2003 9:34 AM
Trackbacks: View (0)Ping
Comments

Bryan,

In this article http://www.nytimes.com/2003/05/13/international/middleeast/13BOMB.html
it states that 29 people are dead. Saudi state TV says that 194 people were wounded. Since they are habitual liars, we are allowed the assumption that the carnage was much worse.

So, I can’t agree that this attack is “pathetic.” I think it is still capable of great lethality. Some other blogger, not you, said that the Kenya hotel attack showed that Al Qaida was losing steam. This was the attack where terrorists with shoulder-fired rockets attacked Israeli planes. They missed. If they had hit their targets, would that blogger have been right?

The lethality of Al Qaida’s handiwork waxes and wanes. They may be on the defensive now, but they are not on the ropes by a long shot.

Posted by Diana on May 13, 2003 10:23 AM

I may have jumped the gun on the “pathetic” bit. But when compared to al Qaeda’s ambition, which is to always top itself with ever larger and more spectacular attacks aimed at not only our citizens and military but at our economy, this attack does seem rather small. If their aim is to win the war by killing us 90 or 100 at a time while we take over whole countries of theirs, they won’t last long enough to win.

Posted by Bryan on May 13, 2003 3:31 PM

And it was stupid of them, too, because they are not gonna get the same kind of no-guts no-balls response from this President that they have gotten under previous presidents. (That’s not a stab only at Clinton, by the way. Every President, pre-9/11 has appeased Muslim terrorists.)

Posted by Diana on May 13, 2003 4:35 PM

I can’t say I’d argue with you. Ghadafi might, but I won’t.

Posted by Bryan on May 13, 2003 6:06 PM
Post a comment