Now Playing on JYB Films

Anatomy of the Comic Jihad


Movie File Host
YouTube YouTube
Putfile Putfile


Movie File Host
YouTube

The Meaning of Taqiyya







button02b
fpawbn
July 2007
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31        
$1 Shipping for 4 days, only at Overstock.com!
button
Archives

Content Staff
Technical Staff
credit where due
This site is still alive and kicking thanks to the generosity and talents of Alan M. Carroll (aka Annoying Old Guy). Without him, the JYB would still be suffering with Blogger's bad code and long-term archive loss.
Powered by
Hosted By
Anti-Junk: 7719 sources banned.

DID REP. MCDERMOTT TAKE SADDAM'S MONEY?

As reported in NewsMax, the Weekly Standard (story not online--I checked) says apparently he did, via a middleman. The story goes that McDermott accepted the cash within a month of his infamous visit to Baghdad last year--a visit during which he accused President Bush of lying in order to get America into war with Iraq. And McDermott's cash source is connected to another curious Saddamite apologist:

McDermott collected the payment from Shakir al-Khafaji, the same Detroit-based Baghdad apologist who paid former U.N. weapons inspector Scott Ritter $400,000 two years ago to make a pro-Saddam documentary about Iraq.

Appearing live from Baghdad on the Sept. 29 broadcast of ABC's "This Week," McDermott proclaimed, "The president of the United States will lie to the American people in order to get us into this war." The comment generated a firestorm of criticism in the U.S. that earned him the moniker "Baghdad Jim."

A little less than a month later, on Oct. 25, McDermott accepted a check from al-Khafaji for $5,000, made out to the anti-war Democrat's "Legal Expense Trust."


This looks mighty treasonous if it turns out to be true. Can't say I'm surprised. In fact, I can say advantage JunkYardBlog, if this turns out to be true.
Post to del.icio.us

Posted by B. Preston on May 2, 2003 10:10 AM
Trackbacks: View (0)Ping
Comments

Even if it’s not specifically treason, it’s specifically grounds for expulsion from Congress. Section 3 of the 14th amendment, which was really meant to kick out Confederates, is nonetheless written broadly enough to require that Congress must expel traitors.

Posted by ockham on May 2, 2003 11:14 AM

As A Washington State Voter I Think Old Bagdad Jim Has always Sold Out America.

Posted by Jim on May 2, 2003 7:38 PM
Post a comment