Now Playing on JYB Films

Anatomy of the Comic Jihad


Movie File Host
YouTube YouTube
Putfile Putfile


Movie File Host
YouTube

The Meaning of Taqiyya







button02b
fpawbn
July 2007
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31        
$1 Shipping for 4 days, only at Overstock.com!
button
Recent Comments
•By Kyle B
 at Jun 17, 6:40 PM about
 ROE vs ROE
•By Kyle B
 at Jun 17, 6:37 PM about
 ROE vs ROE
Archives

Content Staff
Technical Staff
credit where due
This site is still alive and kicking thanks to the generosity and talents of Alan M. Carroll (aka Annoying Old Guy). Without him, the JYB would still be suffering with Blogger's bad code and long-term archive loss.
Powered by
Hosted By
Anti-Junk: 7719 sources banned.

ROE vs ROE

The pro-abortion groups must be having a Maalox moment today. Norma McCorvey, aka Jane Roe of the (in)famous Roe v Wade case, wants to overturn the precedent that her own case set in 1973. In other words, wants to undo Roe and sent abortion laws and decisions back to the states. She filed a motion in a Texas court today to do just that.

More power to her.

McCorvey's story is by now well-known. She wasn't raped, and therefore lied in order to get her original case before the courts. She was badly used by the pro-abortion lawyers and other forces for decades, made up to be the movement's standard-bearer for the press and cameras but otherwise disrespected and all but ignored when the cameras weren't around. She ended up having the baby she once tried to abort, thanks to the glacial pace of our legal system, and that baby is today a healthy daughter of about 30.

Today Norma McCorvey is a Christian and a pro-life advocate who says she regrets the role she played as Jane Roe. She wants to right the wrong she participated in, and get a case based on lies that has led to the murder of millions of babies overturned.

Like I said, more power to her. I hope she wins, and wins big.

UPDATE: She lost. Disappointing, but not surprising.
Post to del.icio.us

Posted by B. Preston on June 17, 2003 3:27 PM
Trackbacks: View (0)Ping
Comments

I could not find a recent post about the Baathists, so this one will have to do…
I just noticed on Fox news that they now refer to the anti US forces in Iraq as “extremists and regimeists” (I didn’t know regimeist was a word but its FN’s not mine), no longer specifically Baathist. Does this mean they are getting their old jobs back and ‘Baathist’ is getting phased out of the news? I’m probably wrong, but thought it was worth asking.

Kyle

Posted by Kyle B on June 17, 2003 6:37 PM

ok a quick visit to news.google.com proved me wrong, next time Kyle factchecks first! have a good afternoon, and feel free to delete the 2 worthless posts.

Kyle

Posted by Kyle B on June 17, 2003 6:40 PM
Post a comment