Now Playing on JYB Films

Anatomy of the Comic Jihad


Movie File Host
YouTube YouTube
Putfile Putfile


Movie File Host
YouTube

The Meaning of Taqiyya







button02b
fpawbn
July 2007
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31        
$1 Shipping for 4 days, only at Overstock.com!
button
Archives

Content Staff
Technical Staff
credit where due
This site is still alive and kicking thanks to the generosity and talents of Alan M. Carroll (aka Annoying Old Guy). Without him, the JYB would still be suffering with Blogger's bad code and long-term archive loss.
Powered by
Hosted By
Anti-Junk: 7719 sources banned.

GREGG EASTERBROOK, ARCH VILLIAN

At the risk of saying something incredibly crass and politically incorrect, and possibly getting lots of people very angry with me, I'm going to say something to the crowd now after Gregg Easterbrook with torches and pitchforks:

Get over yourselves.

Easterbrook is no anti-Semite. The man attends an ecumenical church where Jews and Christians worship side by side, for goodness' sake. Look over the totality of his writing, and you won't find a whiff of anti-Semitism. Not a whiff. What you'll find is one ill-advised paragraph about a movie he hated and a movie studio that disappoints him, amid some fine writing about an amazing variety of subjects. Nothing more. Easterbrook is one of the good guys, folks.

But it seems that in the present world, you can't be construed or even misunderstood to say a single solitary bad thing about Muslims or Jews without getting yourself into a career-threatening snare (though bashing Christians has never been more fashionable). This kind of thin-skinned witch hunting has got to stop, or we'll run out of good writers pretty soon. We'll also lose the ability to say anything at all, anytime, anywhere.

Easterbrook didn't burn down a synagogue. He didn't paint a swastika on a sidewalk, or incite a riot in a Jewish neighborhood, or hoist the Nazi flag at a Klan rally. He wrote a weak paragraph that was so poorly worded that it was easily mistaken for anti-Semitic animus. That's his crime. He has apologized; let it go.

Have none of you ever said or written anything that you regret? Have you never written or said a single solitary thing that could be misunderstood, or taken to mean something that it didn't? Of course you have. I certainly have. So let's get over ourselves already.

In the mean time, his case is instructive. If you want to keep yourself out of trouble, the path is clear: Get your own ADL.

Just look at Mel Gibson. He makes a movie about the last moments of Christ's life on earth, and the Anti-Defamation League sets out on a campaign to defame him. A US general gives a speech that lines up quite well with mainstream evangelical Christian thought, and gets lambasted by both the LA Times smear machine and MSNBC. And of course the ADL is all over Gregg Easterbrook. If these guys had their own ADL they could at least defend themselves in the public arena. But they don't, so they'll suffer the slings and arrows of outraged blowhards.

So we Christians need ot set up our own ADL to fight off the other ADL, and the atheists, etc etc. It'll be one busy organization, but the down side is it will just be one more bunch of screaming zealots looking to poke their fingers in other peoples' eyes over trivialities (and yes, I think the ADL has crossed the line from legitimate defense organization to nitpicking zealotry in the past year or so--this case is seriously beneath them).

So instead of all that strife, why don't we just all get over ourselves. Now. The real anti-Semites rule big Islamic countries and say idiot things like "the Jews rule the world," while every single other leader of an Islamic country gives him a big standing O. Oh, and they kill Jews, burn down their synagogues and promise an endless jihad until Israel is pushed into the sea (see Arafat, Yasser). They also kill Christians and even non-medieval Muslims, by the way. Easterbrook wrote poorly for once in his life, and has said he's sorry--what more do you folks want from him? His head on a platter? A promise to never be human again? What?

MORE: Jeff Jarvis is as worried as I am about what we're doing to the concept of free speech when we witch hunt people like has been done to Gregg Easterbrook.

Two things: I cannot express strongly enough my outrage at ESPN for firing him, and pushing his great TMQ columns down the memory hole. Bastards. They've lost this viewer for good. Due probably to Disney's totalitarian ways, ESPN has become a bastion of thought police. I am also plenty annoyed with lots of bloggers right now. The bandwagon mentality, the hunt 'em till we bleed 'em ethos that permeates much of the blogosphere, has cost a decent man his job. I hope you're happy. I'm sure not.

Oh, and one more thing. If you folks want to play this game, fine. I demand an apology from Andrew Sullivan and anyone else who has ever used the term theocrat or any other perjorative to describe evangelical Christians as a group. You folks who talk about us as though were some form of American Taliban may not realize it, but you sound far more bigoted than Gregg Easterbrook ever did. Really. So fess up, or I might just start chronicling your offenses. How would you like that?

Post to del.icio.us

Posted by B. Preston on October 17, 2003 10:58 PM
Trackbacks: View (2)Ping
Comments

I agree with your more general point about the excessiveness of efforts to police “offensive” speech, but I’m still not comfortable giving Easterbrook a total pass. “Jewish executives” who “worship money above all else?” That at least warrants a raised eyebrow.

It strikes me as simplistic to say he’s not an anti-semite because he hasn’t burned down a synagogue. What he wrote at makes it entirely fair for readers to wonder whether Mr. Easterbrook harbors stereotypical notions about Jews as money grubbers. He may not hold such views, but it’s at least a reasonable concern. The fact that he has now said “Oops! Sorry.” doesn’t mean that people are unreasonable if they still read Easterbrook with a slightly cautious eye, at least for a while.

Spoons, Easterbrook’s apology was very abject. As I’ve explained in detail on my blog, a careful reading of Easterbrook’s post reveals no anti-Semetism. As he acknowledged, Easterbrook certainly used buzzwords which have anti-Semetic echoes — but it is absolutely clear that he did not write with anti-Semetic intent.

Isn’t the intent the important thing? He didn’t just say, “Oops, sorry.” He has humiliated himself and lost his position at ESPN — what else do you want?

To be sure, Easterbrook’s comments were unusually un-shaded (or blunt, if you will). My disinclination to judge him comes from my inability to peek inside his head as he was writing the article that got him canned (since he’s NOT a co-worker that I can comment on casually…).

As a comment (and NOT as a defense), everyone should bear in mind that he typically travels in circles most of us only read about. I haven’t the faintest idea what he has heard, or seen, that would cause him pen such words. The article in question is so far out of his usual style that I do have to wonder what ‘set him off’ to say such things. Few things occur without prior cause.

As to Easterbrook’s fall, unfortunately ‘hyper-sensitivity’ is the current ‘rule du joir’. In addition, persona assasination seems to be the current blood sport. Having a ‘public position’ nowadays requires a level of self discipline that most people are not capable of maintaining 24/7.

Posted by CPT. Charles on October 18, 2003 6:49 PM

By all means read him with a cautious eye if you want. But don’t keep asking for him to apologize when has in fact apologized, as though you’re free to keep kicking him when he’s down. It’s like a boxing match, and you’re hitting him after the bell has rung. We the people have become much more of a threat to freedom of speech than the government, imho, not because we can throw anyone in jail but because we can endlessly flog them for saying ill advised things. And now ESPN has fired him? Sheesh.

So now ESPN has in the course of a couple of weeks let go of two people for being racists, when they weren’t in fact racists? And with Rush, they took to the air and blasted him after the fact, when they knew that what he said was debatable but not racist. I’ll have a hard time ever watching that PC network again—unless they come down just as hard on Warren Sapp, who this week compared himself to a slave for the NFL slapping him with a well deserved $50k fine. How many “slaves” do you know who can pay a fine that would break most of us but that barely makes a dent in his wallet? Sapp’s comment was in fact racist in my opinion, or at least spoke to a false victimology that has become our plague. So where’s the outcry about that?

Posted by Bryan on October 18, 2003 6:52 PM

“You folks who talk about us as though were some form of American Taliban may not realize it, but you sound far more bigoted than Gregg Easterbrook ever did. Really. So fess up, or I might just start chronicling your offenses. How would you like that?”

I’d like it just fine. I fully admit that I am bigoted against religion, especially fundamentalist/evangelical christianity.

bsti,

I find it odd that you take pride in being a bigot.

Note that you too have have religious beliefs, just like anybody else.

So to state your view more accurately: you are bigoted agains those with different religious beliefs than yours.

Posted by randy on October 20, 2003 1:38 PM

Bryan,

I could have used your help over on this LGF thread. There are so many real, dangerous, hateful people in this world.

…and meanwhile we’re lynching the author of TMQ? Give me a break.

Post a comment