Now Playing on JYB Films

Anatomy of the Comic Jihad


Movie File Host
YouTube YouTube
Putfile Putfile


Movie File Host
YouTube

The Meaning of Taqiyya







button02b
fpawbn
July 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    
$1 Shipping for 4 days, only at Overstock.com!
button
Recent Comments
•By narciso
 at Oct 16, 8:58 PM about
 TOLD YA SO
•By Kevin Murphy
 at Oct 16, 1:55 PM about
 TOLD YA SO
•By Bryan
 at Oct 15, 10:25 PM about
 TOLD YA SO
•By Geoff Matthews
 at Oct 15, 3:53 PM about
 TOLD YA SO
•By Spoons
 at Oct 15, 2:34 PM about
 TOLD YA SO
•By Bryan
 at Oct 15, 12:09 PM about
 TOLD YA SO
•By ordi
 at Oct 15, 10:44 AM about
 TOLD YA SO
•By Spoons
 at Oct 15, 9:51 AM about
 TOLD YA SO
Archives

Content Staff
Technical Staff
credit where due
This site is still alive and kicking thanks to the generosity and talents of Alan M. Carroll (aka Annoying Old Guy). Without him, the JYB would still be suffering with Blogger's bad code and long-term archive loss.
Powered by
Hosted By
Anti-Junk: 598 sources banned.

TOLD YA SO

Hm...who said that there was something odd about the way Clueless Joe Wilson was handling the way his CIA wife was outed? Who, looking at all the available data (which isn't much)--the former ambassador's skin-deep survey of Niger's uranium industry, the nearly giddy way he's been out and about turning his wife into a martyr, the odd story that he divulged to MoDo in which Ms. Plame outed herself to him on or near their first date, the fact that the only CIA agent on record about Plame's NOC status has been retired for years--concluded that it's nearly impossible that some White House operative actually outed a real live secret agent to Bob Novak? And who was apparently proven right by a Nick Kristof column?

Um, that would be me. Hold your applause; I've got more.

We learned last week that Ms. Plame was apparently outed in 1994 by none other than Aldrich Ames. He gave her name, along with many others, to Soviet and Russian agents, thus wrecking Plame's NOC status. She met Wilson some time in 1996 or 1997, and by that time was already on her way out of NOC. By the time whoever outed her to Bob Novak this spring, Plame hadn't apparently been under cover for something like 9 years (the Kristof column says she was taken off NOC this year before being outed, but that makes little sense--why would the CIA leave a compromised agent under cover for so long?) So for you Dem types who are hot to make this issue into a crime, you're out of luck.

So who outed her? My gut feeling is it's about 65% that Wilson himself outed her to Novak. It fits with the known facts, and with the logic of the case.

Wilson got sent by someone in the CIA on a mission apparently designed to discredit one rationale for war, namely that the Iraqis had tried to obtain uranium to build a nuclear weapon. He was not sent on a serious mission of inquiry, just a junket to provide the CIA with some cover once the question rose to the forefront. Wilson was singularly unqualified for this mission, as he demonstrated in the way he conducted it, the way he reported it to the CIA, and the way he wrote about it after the fact. His sole qualification was that he had connections in the region, which isn't much of a qualification, and secondarily that his wife was a WMD expert for the CIA. The one card he had to play to make his mission look more legitimate was to bring his wife--the WMD expert--into play. She had the very expertise that he lacked. So he spilled to Bob Novak, a reliably anti-war conservative columnist, telling him about her as a way to lend credibility to himself. He outed her, and has been running around charging the Bush administration with some kind of crime ever since. He knows the truth; Plame hasn't been a bona fide secret agent for years.

How would the White House benefit from this disclosure? I don't see a benefit for them in outing Plame, as it makes Wilson's credibility on WMD rise slightly. Further, this White House seems to understand how, when and why to keep a secret, unlike the previous security sieve of an administration. That doesn't discount the possibility that some White House dunderhead outed Plame on the mistaken impression that it would help their cause, but it just doesn't make logical sense. Wilson's outing her does.

I'm 65% sure of this, which leaves lots of weasel room to be wrong. And we'll probably never know, because for Wilson to come forward now would destroy him, his wife, and whoever within the CIA decided to send him on a sensitive mission of the highest importance for which he was wholly unqualified and which he obviously did not take seriously for some reason. Novak should talk, either on his own or under oath if necessary.

And that's the real crime here, to the extent that there is a crime at all. Someone in the CIA apparently ran a rogue operation designed to discredit the President they are supposed to serve. In a time of war. If you're looking for a mole, look no further than whoever sent Joe Wilson to Niger. And in outing his wife as I suspect, Wilson may have unintentionally forced the CIA to shut down some of her operations that even he knew nothing about. That fits what we know about how Wilson operated in Niger, oblivious and less than skilled, but ultimately full of himself.

Another question--why is the CIA just now getting around to assessing the damage from this episode? Plame was outed months ago; is the CIA in the habit of waiting until something makes headlines before looking into it?

Oh, and I'm still not back from haitus. Really. And Rush was apparently right all along about Donovan McNabb being overrated. He stunk up Texas Stadium on Sunday, which is obviously fine with me.

Post to del.icio.us

Posted by B. Preston on October 15, 2003 8:48 AM
Trackbacks: View (1)Ping
Comments

No way, dude. Not a chance. Novak would have cut Wilson loose by now.

Not if Novak was in on it.

Posted by ordi on October 15, 2003 10:44 AM

Spoons, you’re not thinking like a reporter (always a forgivable offense). Wilson or whoever blabbed to Novak is a source. Novak is an old-school reporter, and would not burn a source no matter what. Especially in a public way—no source would ever trust him again, thus his ability to get future scoops evaporates.

Posted by Bryan on October 15, 2003 12:09 PM

Bryan, there are several reasons I think that’s a flawed theory. First, Novak would have rightly seen Wilson’s subsquent running around to the press as a betrayal, and I doubt would have felt the need to keep his secret any longer. Second, at the very least, Novak would have announced emphatically that it was NOT Karl Rove, after Wilson pointed the finger at him. Third, Novak has done a lot of hinting about his sources following the outbreak of the scandal. None of those hints point to Wilson.

Now, none of this matters if you believe, as ordi suggests, that Novak and Wilson are involved in a conspiracy to discredit Bush by planting the the story, but that is truly tinfoil hat territory.

I don’t buy it, but for a different reason. Novak’s column basically tried to discredit Wilson, and the fact about his CIA wife was simply in passing. And even then, it was more to suggest nepotism as the reason for his job, and not any real qualifications.

The theory has its flaws—that I’ll grant. Any theory based on such limited info will be flawed—every read any theories on the dark energy that’s apparently accelerating the expansion of the universe? They’re head-spinning and all flawed in some big way or another, precisely because we know exactly nothing about dark energy. But proposing theories gets you somewhere, even when they turn out to be wrong, so I keep tossing up theories with the idea that they’ll either help clarify the issue or at least lead to knocking some possibilities down.

For instance, my theory that Plame was most likely not on NOC status when she was allegely outed has turned out to be closest to the truth of any of the theories put out there. You’ve got Josh Marshall and the Usual Carpers out there blathering on about how the leaker is as bad as Aldrich Ames, but they’re so wrong-headed that they ignore the obvious fact that if Ames outed Plame in 1994, a leaker in 2003 by definition can’t be as bad as Ames—he gave her name to people who would’ve killed her and anyone associated with her given the chance; the alleged WH leaker merely got her name in a news column and may inadvertently have gotten some other operations shut down. Huge difference, but just one more distinction of fact lost on the Bush haters. But my (and Chris Regan’s) theory helped tease out some angles that I haven’t seen anywhere else, namely that Plame’s status as reported is most likely a part of her past career, but not her present or future career, so therefore by definition the alleged leaker cannot have committed a crime. They have probably done something very wrong and if they’re WH personnel they should be fired, but they will not face jail time.

So anyway, whether the Wilson as leaker theory ultimately holds up isn’t all that important, though I find it interesting and even plausible knowing what we know now. But putting the idea out there may jog my brain in a new direction, or may get some of you folks going in some new direction which proves productive. That’s what theories are for.

Posted by Bryan on October 15, 2003 10:25 PM

It wasn’t Wilson because Novak wouldn’t have said it was an administration source.

Still, how dumb was Wilson in telling the world through the NYT that he was just on a mission for the CIA if his wife is an undercover operative for the CIA? Who’s not worried about her safety?

I’m wondering about the CIA in all this. How did a administration official find out that Plame worked for the CIA? Only the CIA could have let slip that information - in which case we also need to investigate the CIA on who told and how. Why isn’t the press wondering the same thing?

It turna out, according to the Boston Globe of all things, that Brewster-Jennings, was the most transparent cover since the Potemkin Village. This supposed energy company, was billed as a legal services firm

Posted by narciso on October 16, 2003 8:58 PM
Post a comment