Now Playing on JYB Films

Anatomy of the Comic Jihad


Movie File Host
YouTube YouTube
Putfile Putfile


Movie File Host
YouTube

The Meaning of Taqiyya







button02b
fpawbn
July 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    
$1 Shipping for 4 days, only at Overstock.com!
button
Archives

Content Staff
Technical Staff
credit where due
This site is still alive and kicking thanks to the generosity and talents of Alan M. Carroll (aka Annoying Old Guy). Without him, the JYB would still be suffering with Blogger's bad code and long-term archive loss.
Powered by
Hosted By
Anti-Junk: 502 sources banned.

TELLING FALLUJAH'S STORY TO THE WORLD

Blood stained walls. Mosques doubling as massive weapons caches. GPS units with waypoints leading to western Syria.

When the Marines finished driving the terrorists and Saddamite dead-enders from Fallujah in mid November, they swept through the city to determine what Zarqawi and his minions had done with the place. The Marines found evidence of numerous war crimes, they found bomb factories and weapons caches and slaughterhouses used by the terrorists to hold and murder hostages.

According to an after-action PowerPoint report composed by the 1st Marine Expeditionary Force titled “Telling the Fallujah Story to the World” and dated November 20, 2004, American and Iraqi troops found a staggering array of sites, the loss of which should at least temporarily cripple the terrorists. These sites also serve as proof that far from being “insurgents” or anything noble or good, the combatants defeated in Fallujah were terrorists and enemies of humanity. All of the images linked from this post are from that Marine PowerPoint presentation. For every image linked here, there are half a dozen others depicting everything described in this post.

• Of the 100 mosques in Fallujah, 60 were in use by terrorist forces as either fighting points or weapons caches. Using religious sites to store weapons or to stage attacks is a war crime.

• Three hospitals had been turned into terrorist defensive positions. Using hospitals to conduct combat is a war crime.

• There was at least one weapons cache for every five blocks in the city, for a total of 203 major terrorist weapons storage caches.

• These caches contained thousands of weapons, from anti-tank guided missiles to land mines and mortar rounds. A total of 653 improvised explosive devices of the type used in roadside ambushes against Coalition troops were found in a total of eleven IED factories.

• Two sites contained evidence of foreign fighter involvement, the most tantalizing piece of evidence being a global positioning satellite receiver with waypoints leading back from Fallujah to western Syria.

• Three slaughterhouses—sites used to hold and murder hostages—existed within Fallujah. Evidence within those sites included bags of sand used to soak up blood from beheadings. Our troops also found videos of beheadings, photos of beheaded British hostage Kenneth Bigley as well as the cage in which he was kept and videotaped, and even one living hostage chained to a wall. A local citizen, he had been severely beaten as well as deprived of food. He had been tortured. Needless to say, such treatment and execution of civilians is a war crime.

Fallujah was a terrorist fortress and a city of horror. Within the city our troops found weapons labs manufacturing sarin and hydrogen cyanide, among other deadly agents. Notably, hydrogen cyanide turned up in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing case. It was packed into the bomb, apparently intended to be spread into the surrounding city by the blast that was supposed to bring down the tower. The hydrogen cyanide failed, probably because it was incinerated in the explosion. Had it worked as intended, it might have killed thousands.

After the battle, Fallujah's displaced citizens were allowed to return to their homes and resume their lives. For months they had had to live under the thumb of caliphascist zealots. Some probably collaborated with the terrorists, or even joined them. But the majority didn't. They actively tried to help the US and Iraqi forces however they could, and gratefully received humanitarian assistance after the battle ended.

I suppose it's noteworthy that while the International Red Cross and similar advocacy groups have been accusing the US government of condoning and committing war crimes, the Marines have put a stop to true atrocities in Fallujah. I suppose it's also noteworthy that though the images linked here have been available to the press for more than a week, they have yet to show up in any widespread publication. As usual, it's up to blogs to tell the complete story of what's taking place in Iraq.

(thanks to the Jawa Report for sending me the PowerPoint)

Post to del.icio.us

Posted by B. Preston on December 6, 2004 10:47 PM
Trackbacks: View (3)Ping
Comments

Well with a media focuses on how prejudice we are because we sing Christmas songs during Christmas what do you expect? They think we want a point of view that shows how bad we are and we should sympathize with terrorist and their cause.

I have a hand held GPs. Man those things will leave map trails where the GPS has been. Must be interesting to see where they’ve been and maybe waypoints they were going to. Also I believe you can ask the manufacture of your GPs to track it. I wander if they can just track the ones the area? If We didn’t have to give terrorist notice when we’re coming prob could have found more.

On the other hand if we could have just blown up the damn place! Cost us one too many lives if you ask me. But just like the Ike dvd that just came out. Ike planned D-Day because he didn’t want to bomb Europe to pieces. Cost Americans a lot of lives and those other great lives of our Allie.

Posted by bWb on December 7, 2004 1:19 AM

The Fallujah operation seemed like a mini version of the overall Iraq invasion. We make too many announcements about the operation prior to pulling the trigger, giving the bad guys lots of time to plan, arm, hide things, move things, etc. I’m no military planner, but I thought one of the concepts of warfare was the element of surprise. Have we let the fear of international condemnation of civilian casualties supercede our desire to win decisively with as few military casualties as possible? It’s almost laughable (if it weren’t so damned serious and tragic) how we tell everyone our plans. OK. We’re going in soon. Get ready. It’ll be any day now. OK. It’s about to happen. Good grief!

Posted by Jimbo on December 7, 2004 8:41 AM

When you’re dealing with an operationally incompetent enemy who’s conducting ‘violence as theater’ operations it seems like it might be useful to telegraph your operations so that your opponent can respond appropriately. In this instance by massing his resources in what turns out to be an ultimately futile attempt to oppose our swamp-draining. An operationally offensive tactical defense would have one occupying an area that your opponent feels is vital thus forcing him to attack you in a position of your choosing. Here we tell everyone that we’re going to occupy an area, but not just yet, giving our opponent the ‘opportunity’ to dig in and oppose our operation…kind of a tactical-jitsu of sorts ;)

Posted by JSAllison on December 7, 2004 10:43 AM

Allison,

But doesn’t that give thugs like Zarqawi an opportunity to relocate to a new theater and begin operations elsewhere? He knows he can’t take us on head first and that those in place will be destroyed. That’d give me incentive to want to lengthen my life and redeploy to keep the battle raging.

I know that I don’t have the knowledge to question military planners, but it seems that this kind of thing keeps happening. But, I could be wrong and will just have to trust the experts, I guess.

Posted by Jimbo on December 7, 2004 11:26 AM

Jimbo;

It probably would have been better to have strategic surprise. But military planners, unlike Leftists and Old Media, operate in a reality based way. They may well have figured that, because of the way Old Media works here, there was no way to not telegraph the assault. Given that, the planners probably tried to make the best of a bad lot (which is how almost every military operation ends up, even if not originally planned that way). It’s the height of bad military planning to make one’s plans dependent on factors that are unlikely or impossible to achieve.

annoying old guy:

my guess is that the reason the assault was announced had nothing to do with “Leftists and Old Media.” they said the purpose of the assault was to deny the insurgents a base of operations, not to necessarily capture specific people. also you have to remember that they were going to be attacking a city that was mostly made up of civilians. a “surprise assault” on the entire city would have undoubtedly ended with the deaths of thousands of noncombatants. it had nothing to do with the media.

Post a comment