Now Playing on JYB Films

Anatomy of the Comic Jihad


Movie File Host
YouTube YouTube
Putfile Putfile


Movie File Host
YouTube

The Meaning of Taqiyya







button02b
fpawbn
November 2007
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30  
$1 Shipping for 4 days, only at Overstock.com!
button
Archives

Content Staff
Technical Staff
credit where due
This site is still alive and kicking thanks to the generosity and talents of Alan M. Carroll (aka Annoying Old Guy). Without him, the JYB would still be suffering with Blogger's bad code and long-term archive loss.
Powered by
Hosted By
Anti-Junk: 1335 sources banned.

Defining Diabolism Down

Some academic mediaevalist thinks he’s discovered the “correct” version of the Devil—as an overzealous bureaucrat or prosecutor:

Professor Kelly argues from Luke iv that Satan is a minister of God in charge of the world. “He’s a government heavy, whose main job is to test human beings and to accuse them of their misdeeds, but he is cynical and overzealous in performing his duties,” the professor says. “We can think of an unscrupulous and feared official investigator or prosecutor, like J. Edgar Hoover or Senator Joseph McCarthy.”

Another mediaevalist has already discovered this convention, of course, and exploited it to great effect without trivializing the problem of evil. Lewis would have had a field day with this Professor Kelly. But since Lewis is away:

Professor Kelly: “makes the case for Satan as more a “functionary of the divine court” than “an enemy of God as well as of Man, a convicted cosmic outlaw”.

1st Peter 5:8: “… your adversary the devil walks about like a roaring lion, seeking whom he may devour.”

Good DAY, sir!

H/T to WorldMagBlog.

Post to del.icio.us

Posted by SeeDubya on August 17, 2006 12:43 AM
Trackbacks: View (0)Ping
Comments

I find the functionary point of view more theologically plausible than the adversarial, unless you don’t believe God is omnipotent. If the existence and activities of Satan serve God’s purposes, then Satan is working for God, regardless of what other labels you want to put on the relationship.

P.S. It’s not clear that making Satan a functionary is defining diabolism down. Who really killed all those Jews in WWII? The guards or the functionaries who made the system work? See Banality of Evil.

AOG, I think you’re confusing result with intent. Think God would be miffed if Lucifer hadn’t tried to set up on his own? I don’t. I also think it could not possibly be worth it to be at odds with God if it weren’t for a power grab. I.E. if Lucifer were taking orders from God, there wouldn’t be a Satan.

I don’t see God’s omnipotence as inconsistent with free will—ours, or the devil’s.

Posted by See-Dubya on August 18, 2006 1:56 AM

I’m in agreement with that. Tell me if some knot of tortured syntax above made it seem like I wasn’t. :)

Omnipotence is oxymoronic.

Proof: Propose that God G is “omni” potent. Either: 1. God G can create Thing H of set amount of potency - and then Thing H beats up God G, thus, God G is no LONGER omni-potent. Or: 2. God G cannot create Thing H, which means we’ve found something that God G can’t do. Q. E. f’in D.

Whoop-de-do, David Ross. That’s a perfect example of junior-high-school arguing there. God can’t create square circles either, nor objects too heavy for Him to lift, nor can He make two plus two equal six, because such intellectual “tests” are nonsensical and self-contradictory by definition. (And you don’t have to know God to see that the principle of non-contradiction is the foundation of all logic; that pagan Aristotle discovered that for himself 2500 years ago.)

Posted by craig on August 23, 2006 4:25 PM
Post a comment