Now Playing on JYB Films

Anatomy of the Comic Jihad


Movie File Host
YouTube YouTube
Putfile Putfile


Movie File Host
YouTube

The Meaning of Taqiyya







button02b
fpawbn
July 2007
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31        
$1 Shipping for 4 days, only at Overstock.com!
button
Archives

Content Staff
Technical Staff
credit where due
This site is still alive and kicking thanks to the generosity and talents of Alan M. Carroll (aka Annoying Old Guy). Without him, the JYB would still be suffering with Blogger's bad code and long-term archive loss.
Powered by
Hosted By
Anti-Junk: 7223 sources banned.

Red on Fred: The knives are out about Thompson's faith (UPDATED)

I was going to lauch a big ol' thermobaric rant about James Dobson's ill-considered remarks today. But there's no shortage of anger or ranting on the web right now, so perhaps the best thing for me to do is let this one cool off.

I will say that I had anticipated an attack on Fred's faith; I figured the day after he announced, some egghead at Salon.com would turn in a thousand poisonous words about the Church of Christ, into which Fred was baptized. Instead, the knife in the back came from his erstwhile ally on the right.

Thompson ought to respond to this slight. Dobson has alienated a lot of people with his comment and he's also set up the biggest Sistah Souljah moment of the upcoming race. Fred ought to use this as a chance to talk about his faith, and also to differentiate himself from shrill voices like Falwell and Dobson.

UPDATE, 3/31: Dobson has apologized...well, his remarks and those of his spokesmen. This is one of the rare times I'm going to disagree with JYB founder Bryan Preston about this issue--I think at best Dobson handled this very badly, and had to issue several unclear clarifications before he said something plausible. Bryan's right that you should always triple-check anything controversial in the MSM about major religious figures, especially evangelical leaders like Dobson. But as I said in a comment at that post,

Note back in the original article that Gilgoff allowed [FiF spokesman Gary] Schneeberger to follow up on something Dobson said that he thought was unusual. That’s more thoroughness and courtesy than most MSM reporters would give Dobson in a similar situation.

Unfortunately, if that’s an accurate quote (and this latest defense doesn’t deny it) Schneeberger complicated things even more. ...[T]his wasn’t a matter of trusting what the MSM says about Dobson. This is a matter of trusting what his own people said he meant–which was quite reasonable to do, for the MSM or for hair-trigger bloggers like myself who were upset by the slam.

Incidentally, I noticed that when the third clarification came out, the new spokesperson was identified as “Nima Reza“, [but] the suspicion was still there–he “professes to be a believer”. I think that’s either redundant or skeptical–one step short of “claims to be”. He’s a believer. He maybe as much a Church of Christ saint as Rudy is a good Catholic, he may have faith but not works, he may never go to church, but there’s something there.

More thoughtful stuff on this controversy at Batesline.

And by the way, I think Dobson hasn't endorsed Newt Gingrich the same way Hugh Hewitt hasn't endorsed Mitt Romney.

Post to del.icio.us

Posted by SeeDubya on March 29, 2007 2:25 AM
Trackbacks: View (0)Ping
Comments

The reaction to his comments are an overreaction. It is nothing other than the media trying to prey on a possible division. They’ll beat anything to try to get some juicy story on it in this case.

Dobson made a comment that he didn’t think the man was a CHristian. So what? Maybe Thompson is and maybe he will state that he is and clear the record. Maybe he isn’t, but I’d still vote for him if he was the Republican ticket. The Christian community is not stupid and they are not going to be taking what Dobson said as a) their marching orders, b) that they should avoid voting for him at all costs, even if it means voting for the Dems, and c) the divinely spoken word of God about who they are suppose to vote for.

Seriously, the reaction/response to this is silly and unnecessary.

Agreed. Dobson is no Falwell, but the media seems to make a hobby of doing their best to make him seem so. This remark they reference merely observed that Thompson’s beliefs might cost him some Christian votes.

Posted by Thursday on March 30, 2007 9:14 PM

Actually I think that it’s sort of classy that Thompson had his spokesman respond that he was a Christian and let it go at that. That was all I needed to hear, actually all I wanted to hear and I think so much more of Fred Thompson for it.

Posted by Buzzy on March 30, 2007 9:54 PM

I’m not saying that Dobson handled this thing particularly well. But the framing of the original story had him “snubbing” Thompson. A snub, at least in my way of thinking, is when someone goes out of their way to cause offense to someone else. But what really happened here is that Dobson was asked a question and answered it, not particularly well, with a lot of caveats and impressions. The impressions got into the story, but not the caveats. Then his spokesman made things worse in the first “clarification.” The fine art of PR hasn’t made its way into the FRC.

I think we all agree on that. What annoys me about this is that some bloggers jump on stories like this one, slam the Christian at the center of it, never wonder if the MSM reporter was fair (and in this case, apparently he wasn’t) and don’t follow up when the Christian who’s getting criticized tries to get his story out. It’s seems that all the usual rules and roles of blogging no longer apply when a Pat Robertson, Jerry Falwell or James Dobson is involved in the story.

Post a comment