Now Playing on JYB Films

Anatomy of the Comic Jihad


Movie File Host
YouTube YouTube
Putfile Putfile


Movie File Host
YouTube

The Meaning of Taqiyya







button02b
fpawbn
December 2007
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31          
$1 Shipping for 4 days, only at Overstock.com!
button
Archives

Content Staff
Technical Staff
credit where due
This site is still alive and kicking thanks to the generosity and talents of Alan M. Carroll (aka Annoying Old Guy). Without him, the JYB would still be suffering with Blogger's bad code and long-term archive loss.
Powered by
Hosted By
Anti-Junk: 624 sources banned.

Now there's a Plover Lover

A staple of the right-wing blog commentariat is an odd duck named Spurwing Plover, although he goes under other names. I've never spotted him around here, though I did pick him out at Patterico's under the name "krazy kagu". Anyway, he's a card. I was thinking about him when I saw this odd tale of pro-plover violence by a sharpshooting militant birdwatcher:

The night was last Nov. 7. Tiring of the election returns, Mr. Stevenson drove to the beach, 15 minutes from his house. His headlights picked up a pod of piping plovers, an endangered shore bird. They were asleep, and a lame cat was creeping up on them. Mr. Stevenson flushed the birds. The cat skittered into the dunes.

He drove home and went online. Galveston's city code required pets to have tags. It banned them from the beaches. That cat had no tags and it was on the beach. Texas penal law made it a crime to kill animals, but only those "belonging to another." Mr. Stevenson slept on it. Next morning, he picked up his .22-caliber rifle, got into his Ornithological Society van, and went cat hunting.

Not for the first time. A bird-watcher's bird watcher, Mr. Stevenson has 5,000 species on his life list. He moved here from Florida in 1996 to lead bird tours, put out a bird newspaper and write bird books. He built a house in a copse where birds find food -- and so do bird-eating cats. On his own property, and therefore within the law, he has picked off at least a dozen.

"Point blank, right in the ear," Mr. Stevenson says.

On that morning, as he tells it, it only took a minute for him to spot the limping cat under the bridge. He rolled down his van window part way, rested the rifle barrel on the edge of the glass, and squeezed off a shot. "That cat dropped like a rock," says Mr. Stevenson, who then heard a "spewing of profane language" from up on the bridge.

It was the toll taker, John Newland. Mr. Newland, who is 69 and a former real-estate broker, picks up the story: "I ran out and hollered," he says. And while another toll taker called the cops, "that idiot took off. I said, 'I'm gonna get him. So I jumped into my truck and ran him down all the way to Jamaica Beach." Which is where Mr. Stevenson was met by four police cars.

Mr. Newland is now the prosecution's star witness. The grand-jury indictment, handed up in April, identifies him as the "owner of said cat," Mr. Stevenson's victim. Under Texas law, killing somebody else's animal without permission, no matter how, can buy two years in the pen. But the state's case depends on proving that the cats under the San Luis Pass bridge are Mr. Newland's pets.

Does he own them? Does anyone really ever own a cat?

And also, is shooting a cat cruel? In Texas, maybe not:

...when the legislature passed the cruelty law in 2001 it was only after somebody gouged out a puppy's eyeballs. In toughening the law this year, members said they were mainly thinking of the sort of person who might run over a cat with a lawnmower.

"In the minds of Texans," says Shannon Edmonds, a lobbyist for state prosecutors who helped draft the statute, "if you shoot something, that's not being cruel."

Gouging out a puppy's eyeballs? Shooting people like that wouldn't be cruel, it would be a kindness.


Post to del.icio.us

Posted by SeeDubya on September 1, 2007 9:41 PM
Trackbacks: View (0)Ping
Comments

Saw that bit about the puppies eyes - WTF is going on in that person’s life? And I’ve thought lots of nasty thoughts about the neighborhood stray cats around here but I’ve never considered running one over with the mower. They do things different in Texas, I guess.

Posted by Occasus on September 1, 2007 10:54 PM

The sad part of it all is that Newland, the bridgebastard, will not be prosecuted for purjury for claiming ownership of a ferral cat. Nor will he be brought up for assault for attempting to run Stevenson off the road, or the other fitting charges of which he is guilty.

Its time to enact the Nifrong act. A jury shall always be offered a choice of not guilty by reason of malicious persecution, upon which finding, the Prosecuter shall be remanded to the nearest prison for a term of the greater of one year, or one fifth of hte maximum sentence that could have been imposed had the defendant been found guilty. Further, the trial judge, and the convening judge, if diffrent shall be remanded for a period of two years, or one tenth of the maximum sentence which ever is greater.

Posted by Jeremy on September 2, 2007 9:47 AM

There is no mention anywhere in the article that the Piping Plover is a federal protected endangered species. Significant federal funds go into protecting that species from extinction. Why use federal money to keep a bunch of stray cats alive? What has beome of common sense nowadays? It is even more endangered than the plover itself…

Posted by Flint on September 2, 2007 11:08 AM

Personally, I wouldn’t hesitate to shoot a cat to protect Spurwing Plover.

Isn’t it ironic that these nature-loving birders are so eager to see blood spilled?

Posted by Coco on September 2, 2007 4:34 PM

Jim Stevenson is a great bird-lover and did nothing wrong. I would shoot a cat that was going after any bird. These birds are federally protected and cats are indoor pets. The only issue is what is going to be done about the feral cat issue? It is a huge problem for birds and they face enough problems already!

Post a comment