CNN: You Can Lead A Horticulture
Okay, stupid post title. The title should be, "why this debate agriculture matters". For the answer we turn to Hot Air commenter Buy Danish:
Speaking of suits, I posted this on one of the other threads, but look at what the CNN Suit in Chief, David Bohrman, who is their “Washington bureau chief and executive producer of the debate”, promised:From: Sneak Peek at CNN/YouTube Debate Videos/By Ariel Alexovich, dated November 21, 2007.…many of the remaining posts involve asking the candidates to defend their opposition to gay marriage and abortion. Those kinds of “lobbying grenades” would be disqualified by the CNN selection team, Mr. Bohrman said.
“There are quite a few things you might describe as Democratic ‘gotchas,’ and we are weeding those out,” Mr. Bohrman said. CNN wants to ensure that next Wednesday’s Republican event is “a debate of their party.”
The suit has a few questions to answer. I don’t recall any “gay marriage” questions, but they sure did a lousy job of weeding!
Heh. He said "weeding". Looks like he missed a few. Oh, and from that article linked above, let's not let Anderson Cooper off just yet:
Some crafty people seem to think that addressing debate host Anderson Cooper in their video will give them the edge to be chosen, but Mr. Bohrman said such pandering to CNN is grounds for disqualification. Mr. Cooper and two of his researchers are involved in the selection process, Mr. Bohrman noted.I wonder if he noticed that one young lass was such a so totally huge Anderson Cooper fan (as well as an Edwards fan)?











