Now Playing on JYB Films

Anatomy of the Comic Jihad


Movie File Host
YouTube YouTube
Putfile Putfile


Movie File Host
YouTube

The Meaning of Taqiyya







button02b
fpawbn
February 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29  
$1 Shipping for 4 days, only at Overstock.com!
button
Archives

Content Staff
Technical Staff
credit where due
This site is still alive and kicking thanks to the generosity and talents of Alan M. Carroll (aka Annoying Old Guy). Without him, the JYB would still be suffering with Blogger's bad code and long-term archive loss.
Powered by
Hosted By
Anti-Junk: 590 sources banned.

I blog, you decide, oh, and shut up

Rush Limbaugh: Why should we shut up?

In Nevada, Romney cleans up, and nobody talks about it. "Romney is nowhere. He's off the charts. He should quit. Thompson should quit. He should get out of the race!" They remain on the McCain bandwagon. Now the people on the McCain bandwagon are telling those of us who aren't on the McCain bandwagon, to shut up. Just be quiet. We are supposedly damaging the Republican Party.

We are supposedly damaging the conservative movement. We should just shut up. Just sit by and watch all this stuff and let it happen and just be quiet. What is the point? By the way, it's aimed at people in talk radio. Why should we in talk radio "just shut up," and start supporting the front-runner of the moment? Especially when you realize that's what the Drive-By Media wants! Why should we in talk radio sit here and take our marching orders from the Drive-By Media and others in our movement who write what they write, for liberals in the Drive-By Media. Why should we do that. McCain, frankly, has shown conservatives little but contempt over many years.

(P.S. I don't see where anyone said Rush should shut up, but anyway...)

Mrs R at Wuzzadem: Why should you shut up? Because you're ungrateful! Look at all McCain has done for conservatism!

The Anchoress:
Shut up and go to the woodshed!

It seems the standard GOP voter - and apparently Rush Limbaugh - wants to disinter Ronald Reagan from his noble tomb and hoist him onto the campaign trail because he is their saint and savior, and if they can’t vote for someone exactly like him “Ronaldus Magnus” well, they’re going to sit out this all-important election.

Excuse me, but Ronald Reagan would have had no patience for the likes of you.

Unless I am mistaken - and forgive me if I am, but I was a headline-believing Democrat when Reagan was in office, so I cannot quote the Book of Reagan as completely as some - did not Reagan advise an 11th Commandment: Thou shalt not criticize other Republicans?

I don’t know if I completely agree with that commandment, by the way, but he’s your idol, not mine. I can tell you that I do agree with another of Reagan’s dicta: that we ought not allow the perfect to be the enemy of the good.

Powerline: Whoa, Whoa, everybody calm down.

Michelle Malkin: Not shutting up, no sir:

For all his supposed new-found enlightenment about what most Americans want — protection against invasion, commitment to the rule of law, meaningful employer sanctions, an end to sanctuary cities, enforcement-by-attrition plus deportation reform, and an end to special illegal-alien benefits that invite more law-breaking — the Maverick remains a Geraldo Rivera Republican. Like the ethnocentric cable TV host who can’t string a sentence about immigration together without drowning in demagoguery, McCain naturally resorts to open-borders platitudes when pressed for enforcement specifics.
One of her best. Detailed and forceful.

Laura Ingraham: No, no, no dear--we're all out of shut up in the conservative blogosphere/ radiosphere.


See-Dubya: Oh, wait, I remember who was telling us to shut up: McCain's little buddy and possible future Director of Homeland Security.

Oh, and McCain himself, telling a right-to-life group to shut up.

Sorry, was that ungrateful? I'll shut up now.

UPDATE: Mrs. R in the comments, and the Anchoress by e-mail, assure me that they're not calling for anyone to shut up.

UPDATE: PEACE OFFERING TO THE ANCHORESS:
Text not available
 About this book Read this bookHustled History: Or; As it Might Have Been By Edward Verrall Lucaqs, Charles Larcom Graves, George Morrow

Post to del.icio.us

Posted by SeeDubya on January 23, 2008 5:09 AM
Trackbacks: View (1)Ping
Comments

Well, there’s a reason I stopped reading The Anchoress about a year ago.

She’s a pain…

SeeDubya,

I’m not telling anyone to shut up, evah. These disagreements are what the primary process is all about. It may not be pretty at times, but if we can’t stand the heat now, we’re toast come November.

As for being grateful for things, what’s so bad about that? :-)

Note on your other post about your efforts to work on Fred’s campaign. I signed up to volunteer locally for Giuliani’s campaign several months ago - not once, but twice. I, too, heard the crickets. But my contact info didn’t go to waste, they did send me letters soliciting $. (Well, I guess it did go to waste because I didn’t send them any money). This was a big red flag for me and a sign that his organization was not the stuff of a presidential/national campaign effort.

Having worked on several political campaigns over the years (as a grunt) I found that the ones that utilize/optimize their resources tend to win, and those that turn volunteers away (or mismanage/underestimate this resource)tend not to.

The best campaign I ever worked on? The Bush campaign in ‘04. Nicest, friendliest, hardest-working, most organized and enthusiastic bunch of volunteers and staff, even the visiting higher-ups. And I never signed up a volunteer whose offer to work for the campaign was unappreciated or rejected as too inconsequential.

When the Fred campaign boasted of signing up 16,000 volunteers on the day he announced in Sept., I couldn’t help but wonder how many/how few would actually be contacted/utilized - and how not getting these boots on the ground several months prior (as some other candidates had)was considered a savvy political strategy.

Anyway, and again for the record, I don’t want anyone to shut up. Quite the contrary.

It seems to me that the Anchoress is railing on those saying that they won’t vote in the Presidential election if McCain is the nominee, not people who are agitating during the primaries.

It seems to me that the Anchoress is railing on those saying that they won’t vote in the Presidential election if McCain is the nominee, not people who are agitating during the primaries.

I’ll be honest: my main reason for being one of those people, since the spectre of a McCain candidacy first arose, was to agitate against him getting the nomination. It would have been better if more people had been as up-front about it at the time — maybe the message would have gotten out sooner.

That said, I’m not going to be one of those who come slinking back and abandons my word. If McCain is the nominee, I won’t vote for him. The only reason anyone can give me for why I should, is to keep Hillary or Obama from winning, and that’s essentially the argument Bob Dole used in 1996 (when he was in every way comparable to John McCain in 2008). I voted for Dole, but he lost anyway.

A lot of Republicans obviously hasn’t learned anything since then.

Indeed, I never tell anyone to shut up. What I am saying is “vote, vote, vote” - don’t give up your right to vote. If you have an imperfect candidate, and your vote can still stave off the advent of something worse until - perhaps - the next generation of conservative candidates is ready to run, then vote.

Posted by The Anchoress on January 23, 2008 2:57 PM

Let’s see: the vast majority of Republicans opposed the amnesty bill. The Anchoress believes in Reagan’s 11th commandment—as she puts it, “Thou shalt not criticize other Republicans.” Yet she pretty much called amnesty opponents intolerant bigots. Weird.

Posted by Hondo on January 23, 2008 3:33 PM

I might not have the readership/viewership/listenership of the pros, but I’m not paying for my blog hosting just to shut up. I’m seeing fewer and fewer differences between the two halves of the bipartian Party-In-Government, with nearly all of the changes by the “Republicans” toward the Democrats. I’m leaving my write-in options open in the event of a Rudy McCabee nominee, and I’m not committing to Mitt Romney should Rudy McCabee (or a clone) be the VP nominee either.

I invite you to go into my archives and see where I called anyone an “intolerant bigot.”

And - as I’m not really a Republican, and Reagan is not MY idol, I don’t have to follow that dicta. In fact, if you read my piece you’ll see, I didn’t completely agree with it! :-)

Posted by The Anchoress on January 23, 2008 7:46 PM

Anchoress:

I invite you to read your blog here:

theanchoressonline.com/2006/05/26/illegals-hysteria-the-place-i-cant-go/

theanchoressonline.com/2006/05/16/blog-meltdowns-egos-and-echo-chambers/

theanchoressonline.com/2007/06/06/part-ii-bush-betrayal-the-nations-soul/

and

theanchoressonline.com/2007/06/08/so-loser-wheres-part-iii/

If you can’t figure out why someone might read those entries and say you didn’t “pretty much call amnesty opponents intolerant bigots,” I don’t know what to say.

Posted by Hondo on January 24, 2008 5:25 AM
Post a comment