Now Playing on JYB Films

Anatomy of the Comic Jihad


Movie File Host
YouTube YouTube
Putfile Putfile


Movie File Host
YouTube

The Meaning of Taqiyya







button02b
fpawbn
February 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29  
$1 Shipping for 4 days, only at Overstock.com!
button
Archives

Content Staff
Technical Staff
credit where due
This site is still alive and kicking thanks to the generosity and talents of Alan M. Carroll (aka Annoying Old Guy). Without him, the JYB would still be suffering with Blogger's bad code and long-term archive loss.
Powered by
Hosted By
Anti-Junk: 584 sources banned.

Wahhabist-funded Gitmo Lawyer Agency Opposes Death Penalty for Terrorists

Knock me over with a belly-slap. The Center for Constitutional Rights, whose dodgy backers were placed under the Junkyard Blog magnifying glass here, here, and here, wasted no time in getting out the brief for Gitmo detainee/ terror suspect Mohammed al-Qahtani:

No military commission against Mr. Al Qahtani will ever achieve justice. Instead, it will deteriorate into a controversy over secret trials and the United States' well-documented torture of Mr. al Qahtani during interrogations at Guantánamo.

Mr. al Qahtani may be the one charged today, but it is the illegality of his interrogation under torture that will be tried in the commission. Regardless of the results, no one will ever have confidence in the outcome of these military commissions. The United States has nothing legitimate to gain from prosecuting prisoners in military commissions at Guantanamo and a great deal to lose.

Wait, who is Mohammed al-Qahtani? No one important, just the accused twentieth 9-11 hijacker. There are six detainees who may face the death penalty; maybe Khaled Sheikh Mohammed isn't CCR's client, but I don't see any mention of him... But then again associating your client's name with KSM's is not exactly good PR, is it?

And if there's one thing the Gitmo lawyers know about, it's good PR.

Oh, and he was, er, "tortured":

Mohammed al-Qahtani, detainee No. 063, was forced to wear a bra. He had a thong placed on his head. He was massaged by a female interrogator who straddled him like a lap dancer. He was told that his mother and sisters were whores. He was told that other detainees knew he was gay. He was forced to dance with a male interrogator. He was strip-searched in front of women. He was led on a leash and forced to perform dog tricks. He was doused with water. He was prevented from praying. He was forced to watch as an interrogator squatted over his Koran.

That much is known. These details were among the findings of the U.S. Army’s investigation of al-Qahtani's aggressive interrogation at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

They keep using that word. I do not think it means what they think it means.

UPDATE: Bryan is (as usual) on the same wavelength.

UPDATE 2: Here's someone I feel a little more sympathy for--a guy getting the death penalty for drinking alcohol. In Iran, of course. Mohsen, this Bud's for you.

Post to del.icio.us

Posted by SeeDubya on February 11, 2008 10:44 AM
Trackbacks: View (0)Ping
Comments

All we really need to do is to spread the word that al-Qahtani has has found God in the Catholic church.

The death penalty will find him.

Posted by drjohn on February 11, 2008 6:05 PM

Did you notice how the article link is called “CONTINUED: Water-boarding” when al-Qahtani was not one of those waterboarded?

Hmmmmm

Posted by drjohn on February 11, 2008 6:16 PM

Great site you have!

Would you like a Link Exchange with THE INTERNET RADIO NETWORK? At the IRN you can listen for free to over 60 of America’s top Talk Shows via Free Streaming Audio! In addition you can email the President, VP, First Lady and Congressional Leaders…

http://netradionetwork.com

Exactly how many “20th hijackers” were there, seems to be as many of those as there are “#3 men” in al queada. I wouldn’t trust anything this administration says!

Posted by madmatt on February 12, 2008 6:59 AM

When the former chief prosecutor resigns his officers commission in protest because of a lack of justice it can not be seen as a good sign

Posted by John Ryan on February 12, 2008 8:09 AM

Whats wrong with letting them rot in jail for the rest of their lives? This is what I don’t get about the death penalty advocates. They seem to believe that life in prison is great or something. When it comes to the Jihadis a worse fate for them is to be degraded in jail. Killing them would just make them martyrs, its what they prefer. I say we send them to Levanworth or Pelican Bay where they can try to find their niche amongst MS13 and the Aryans.

Posted by Andrew on February 12, 2008 10:56 AM

“who is Mohammed al-Qahtani? No one important, just the accused twentieth 9-11 hijacker.”

Really? Because we’ve been told the “20th hijacker” was Ramzi Binalshibh. And Zacarias Moussaoui. And Saeed al-Ghamdi (not to be confused with the successful hijacker of the same name). And Tawfiq bin Attash, Ali Abdul Aziz Ali, Mushabib al-Hamlan, Zakariyah Essabar, Saeed Ahmad al-Zahrani, Ali Abd al-Rahman al-Faqasi al-Ghamdi, Saeed al-Baluchi, Qutaybah al-Najdi, Zuhair al-Thubaiti, and Saud al-Rashi.

In fact, the “20th hijacker” is nearly as ubiquitous as the “top al-qaeda leader” our dear leaders announce that they’ve killed every other week. Hell, even the mythical Hydra couldn’t reconstitute itself this fast.

So perhaps it would be more appropriate (and no less accurate) to refer to him as “the 20th 20th 9-11 hijacker.” At least until our honorable (and completely forthright and honest) leaders decide to let us know who the 21st 20th hijacker was.

Posted by karl on February 12, 2008 11:31 AM

Oh, OK Karl. We should definitely let him go then. Can we drop him off at your house?

if The Center for Constitutional Rights is pushing the terrorist agenda then it makes perfect sense that they would want the tribunal to proceed. this judicial abomination is the quickest way to the final destruction of the US Constitution and all it holds sacred.

Posted by ibfamous on February 12, 2008 12:49 PM

It’s always amazing to me how ready you good Christians are for vengance when you would scream bloody murder if the same treatment were being meted out to you. You would be quite happy to have someone standing up for your right to a fair trial, your right not to have a confession beaten out of you, your right to challenge the evidence against you.

THAT is why the Constitution protects us all. Sometimes that means a ‘bad guy’ doesn’t get the justice he deserves.

But it certainly works better for us good guys than any other system we’ve come up with.

I’ll take fair trials for terrorists over show trials any day. That’s the American way - or at least it was before Bush/Cheney decided to destroy the Constitution.

Posted by LiberalPercy on February 12, 2008 1:27 PM

“Wahhabist-funded” is an interesting characterization. Since Georgie Bush was just in Saudi Arabia on bended knee, asking for a bail-out on energy prices to prop up his disastrous economic failures, does this apply to him? How about the whole Bush family, which has been thick with the Saudi royal family for a generation or two. I mean, who was that let them slip out unnoticed on Sept 12th? There is a true, well documented quid pro quo here.

Posted by Jack Flackett on February 12, 2008 6:31 PM

Ah HA! Jack…so that’s why the Bush administration really wants to execute the terrorists! The Wahhabists have bought them off!

No, wait, that doesn’t make any sense at all.

Post a comment